Research Catalog

Can coal be saved? : a radical proposal to reverse the decline of a major industry

Title
  1. Can coal be saved? : a radical proposal to reverse the decline of a major industry / Colin Robinson and Eileen Marshall.
Published by
  1. London : Institute of Economic Affairs, 1985.
Author
  1. Robinson, Colin, 1932-

Items in the library and off-site

Filter by

Displaying 1 item

StatusFormatAccessCall numberItem location
Status
Request for on-site useRequest scan
How do I pick up this item and when will it be ready?
FormatBook/TextAccessUse in libraryCall numberHD9551.5 .R63Item locationOff-site

Details

Additional authors
  1. Marshall, Eileen.
Description
  1. 63 pages : illustrations; 22 cm
Series statement
  1. Hobart paper ; 105
Uniform title
  1. Hobart paper ; 105.
Subject
  1. Coal mines and mining > Great Britain
  2. Coal > Economic aspects > Great Britain
  3. UE/CE Etats membres
  4. Politique industrielle
  5. Charbonnages
  6. Coal > Economic aspects
  7. Coal mines and mining
  8. Mijnbouw
  9. Steenkool
  10. Herstructurering
  11. Coal
  12. Economics, economic history and consumer affairs
  13. Royaume-Uni
  14. Great Britain
Contents
  1. NATIONALISATION AND AFTER: Government control of a key industry -- Failure of nationalization -- Failure of nationalization -- Failure of British coal to recover -- COAL-FORTY YEARS ON -- THE STRUCTURE OF THE BRITISH COAL MARKET: Demand -- Supply -- Profitability of the nationalized sector -- The private sector -- Private contracting and licensing of the opencast sites -- Liberalizing coal: ways and means -- Privatization and liberalization -- Freeing imports -- Privatizing coal production -- Ownership of coal reserves -- Opencast coal -- Deep-mined coal -- Relaxing existing restrictions on licensed deep mining -- Private and joint ventures for new pits -- Selling existing pits -- Selling existing pits jointly with power stations -- Conclusions on the forms of liberalization -- V. LIBERALISING COAL: ADVANTAGES AND PROBLEMS: State control versus competition -- Reform from within? -- Reduced monopoly power of labour -- Less politicization of decision-making -- Efficiency gains -- 'Uneconomic' pits.
Owning institution
  1. Princeton University Library
Bibliography (note)
  1. Bibliography: p. 61.